The 6 Types Of Reverse Auction That Top-Performing Companies Use
- Robert
- Aug 22
- 13 min read
Table of contents:
Here's a brief podcast if you don't have time to read the whole article:
Procurement is more than just the "get three quotes and pick the cheapest" approach. Top-performing companies create a sourcing culture where competition between suppliers is encouraged transparently through e-auctions, moving well beyond standard e-RFIs and e-RFQs. Today's strategic sourcing balances cost, quality, and supplier relationships while maximizing organizational value.
These companies achieve streamlined, efficient, and fair sourcing processes that deliver significant cost savings. E-auctions generally provide savings of more than 10% compared to previously negotiated prices.
This guide outlines the six primary reverse auction formats that leading companies utilize to drive savings, enhance supplier competition, and streamline procurement workflows. You'll see when each auction type works best, their specific advantages and limitations, and practical guidance for choosing the right format for your needs.
What is a reverse auction?
A reverse auction is a procurement method where suppliers compete by submitting progressively lower bids for a buyer's business, with the lowest qualified bid typically winning the contract. Think of it as a traditional auction flipped on its head, where prices spiral downward through competitive bidding.
The process involves buyers posting requirements and inviting pre-qualified suppliers to bid. Suppliers can see the current lowest bid (though not necessarily who submitted it) and have opportunities to submit lower offers during the bidding period. This transparency creates competitive pressure that often results in significant cost savings.
For a better understanding and implementation strategies, check out our guide on reverse auctions fundamentals.
1. British Reverse Auctions
The British reverse auction is the most frequently used format in procurement. Here's how it works: suppliers can either see their position compared to other bidders, the best price offered, or both throughout a predetermined bidding period.
When setting up a British reverse auction, you can decide on the information suppliers will see and the auction step (the minimum amount between successive bids). There are two main variations you can choose from:
Per Total: When bidding on multiple items in the same auction, suppliers' rank is determined by the total quote. This type works when buyers want to close a deal as a single package composed of multiple quotation lines.
At Item Level: When bidding on multiple items in the same auction, suppliers' rank is determined at the item level, and they can see how they rank compared to other suppliers for each item. This variation works when buyers want to close a deal where various items can be awarded separately to different suppliers.
Advantages of British Reverse Auctions
The transparent nature of British reverse auctions creates several compelling benefits that make them the go-to choice for many procurement scenarios:
Maximum price transparency creates an environment where suppliers understand exactly what they need to beat, often leading to more aggressive bidding as suppliers can gauge their competitiveness in real-time.
Ease of implementation makes this format accessible to organizations new to reverse auctions. Both buyers and suppliers can quickly grasp the mechanics, reducing training time and confusion.
Strong competitive pressure emerges when suppliers can monitor the current best offer, often pushing participants to submit their most competitive pricing earlier rather than waiting until the final moments.
High supplier engagement throughout the auction because participants can track their position relative to competitors, often resulting in better final pricing compared to sealed bid formats.
Disadvantages of British Reverse Auctions
Despite their popularity, British reverse auctions aren't without limitations that procurement professionals should consider:
Risk of marginal bidding can occur when suppliers make tiny incremental price reductions rather than substantial moves, extending auction duration without delivering significant additional savings.
Potential for supplier collusion exists when the same group of suppliers participates in multiple auctions together, as transparent pricing can facilitate coordinated bidding strategies.
Winner's curse scenarios may develop when aggressive bidding leads suppliers to submit unsustainable pricing, resulting in quality issues, delivery problems, or supplier financial distress during contract performance.
Administrative overhead can be substantial, as the dynamic nature requires active monitoring and management throughout the bidding period.
When to use British Reverse Auctions?
British reverse auctions work best when you have well-defined specifications for standardized goods or services with multiple qualified suppliers. This format excels when price is the primary selection criterion and quality differences between suppliers are minimal.
Consider this approach for commodity purchases, standard IT services, or routine maintenance contracts where specifications are clear and supplier capabilities are relatively equal.
But here's a key insight:Â an English reverse auction is inadvisable when you know there's only one bidder who will be the most competitive, as you're essentially giving away negotiating power.
2. Vickrey Reverse Auctions
The Vickrey reverse auction uses a second-price sealed bid mechanism where the winner pays the price of the second-lowest bid rather than their own submitted price. Vickrey auctions work by allowing bidders to instruct the platform to bid on their behalf.
Here's how it works:Â When the auction closes, the winning supplier gets paid the price indicated by the closest competitor, minus a small "step". For example, if supplier A bids 10 EUR per widget and supplier B bids 15 EUR per widget, supplier A wins at 14 EUR (where 1 EUR is the step decided by the buyer).
Competitors are incentivized to declare their real price from the beginning instead of strategizing, making this a powerful instrument where suppliers indicate the minimum price they're willing to accept. Sounds backwards? That's exactly the point.
Advantages of Vickrey Reverse Auctions
The Vickrey format offers several theoretical and practical advantages that appeal to sophisticated procurement organizations:
Encourages truthful bidding because suppliers have no strategic advantage in submitting anything other than their true cost plus desired margin. Since they'll pay the second-lowest price regardless, there's no penalty for aggressive bidding.
Reduces strategic game-playing compared to other auction formats, leading to more straightforward participation since suppliers can't gain an advantage through complex bidding strategies.
Usually carried out in a single step, making it time-efficient. While the auction is open, suppliers input their best prices. Once it closes, the system determines the winner and the price according to the algorithm.
Can produce better pricing in situations where suppliers might otherwise bid conservatively, as the guarantee of paying only the second-lowest price encourages more aggressive initial offers.
Disadvantages of Vickrey Reverse Auctions
The complexity and counterintuitive nature of Vickrey auctions create practical implementation challenges that can limit their effectiveness:
Requires trust in the platform since the auction system must hide actual prices from buyers, and both parties must trust the platform to correctly and confidentially calculate the best prices.
Difficult for suppliers to understand the strategic implications, which can lead to confusion and sub-optimal participation. Many suppliers struggle with bidding their true costs when they know they won't pay their submitted price.
Complex to explain and implement requires significant education for both procurement teams and supplier partners, as the unusual mechanics can create suspicion or reluctance to participate.
Limited real-world adoption means fewer technology platforms support this format, and there's less practical experience available for troubleshooting implementation issues.
When to use Vickrey Reverse Auctions?
Vickrey reverse auctions work best in sophisticated procurement environments where participants understand auction theory and you're dealing with complex, high-value contracts. This format can be effective for specialized services or custom manufacturing where suppliers might otherwise bid conservatively due to uncertainty about competitor capabilities.
Consider this approach when you have a small number of highly qualified suppliers, when contract value justifies the additional complexity, or when procuring innovative solutions where traditional competitive dynamics might not apply.
3. Dutch Reverse Auctions
Dutch reverse auctions show suppliers only a price and a countdown timer. The auction starts with an extremely low price that none of the participants can meet. As the price increases at specified time intervals, eventually one supplier will be able to meet the displayed price.
This format, inspired by traditional Dutch flower auctions, creates urgency and can lead to quick procurement decisions. The first supplier to claim the price gets the deal. Once a price is claimed, the event ends.
When setting up a Dutch reverse auction, you decide the starting price, increments (how much the price increases at each step), validity of an increment (how long a price remains valid), and the number of price changes.
Advantages of Dutch Reverse Auctions
Dutch reverse auctions offer unique benefits that make them suitable for specific procurement scenarios:
Creates immediate urgency among suppliers since hesitation can result in losing the opportunity entirely. Suppliers are motivated to claim the best price they can offer, knowing a competitor may claim the deal first.
Works best with a small number of suppliers, making it ideal for specialized procurement scenarios with limited but qualified participants.
Efficient time management makes this format ideal when procurement timelines are compressed, as auctions conclude quickly once a supplier accepts the current price.
Can incorporate quantity variations where only limited quantities can be claimed by suppliers on various price floors. For example, at 100 EUR, a supplier might only claim 20% of the total quantity.
Disadvantages of Dutch Reverse Auctions
The unique mechanics of Dutch auctions create specific challenges that procurement teams should carefully consider:
Requires extensive buyer research to achieve optimal pricing. The disadvantage is limited market knowledge and comfort that you're getting an accurate estimate, as buyers only make one offer without feedback from other bidders.
High pressure environment can lead to poor decision-making by suppliers who might accept unsustainable pricing for long-term contract performance.
The risk of setting the start price too high can cause financial loss if you don't have adequate background information about the product being sold.
Limited supplier participation may result from the high-pressure format, particularly among smaller suppliers who prefer more time to evaluate pricing decisions.
When to use Dutch Reverse Auctions?
Dutch reverse auctions excel in time-sensitive procurement situations where you need quick decisions and have a good understanding of market pricing. Dutch auctions are better when you know there's only one bidder who will be the most competitive, as it allows others to make bids but never reach the initial price set by the most competitive supplier.
Consider this approach when you have suppliers comfortable with rapid decision-making, when the procurement timeline is compressed, or when you're dealing with standardized products where suppliers can quickly assess their ability to deliver at specific price points.
4. Japanese Reverse Auctions
Japanese reverse auctions are similar to Dutch auctions, where suppliers see only a price and a countdown timer. Instead of starting low, the auction starts high and decreases at predetermined intervals.As the price drops, suppliers who cannot meet the displayed price "opt out" of the auction. The last supplier standing wins the deal.Â
The Japanese auction is a high-tech way to bid that maximizes the benefits of both English and Dutch auctions. When setting up Japanese reverse auctions, you can set different levels of competition visibility. For example, you can choose to show potential suppliers that there are other offers at the same price without specifying how many (which increases psychological pressure), or show that there are X other offers at the same price, giving suppliers room for different bidding strategies.
Advantages of Japanese Reverse Auctions
Japanese reverse auctions provide several distinctive benefits that make them valuable for certain procurement scenarios:
Systematic price discovery occurs as the elimination process reveals true market pricing levels. You can observe exactly where each supplier reaches their pricing limit, providing valuable market intelligence for future procurement planning.
Reduces winner's curse risk because suppliers have multiple opportunities to withdraw rather than being locked into an initial bid that might prove unsustainable, leading to more realistic final pricing.
High psychological pressure from watching competitors drop out often motivates remaining suppliers to continue competing longer than they might in other formats.
Flexible competition visibility allows you to control how much information suppliers see about competitors, enabling different strategic approaches.
Disadvantages of Japanese Reverse Auctions
The elimination-based format creates unique challenges that procurement teams must carefully manage:
Can eliminate good suppliers early if they're conservative about pricing or misunderstand the format, potentially resulting in losing valuable partners who could have been competitive with a better understanding.
Does not show rank, which can be problematic since outcomes are driven by bidder behavior rather than transparent competitive positioning.
Complex to manage requires sophisticated auction software and careful monitoring to ensure fair elimination procedures and proper communication with participants.
Potential for strategic manipulation exists when suppliers attempt to game the elimination process through early exits designed to mislead competitors about market pricing.
When to use Japanese Reverse Auctions?
Japanese reverse auctions work best for complex procurement projects where you want to test market depth and supplier commitment levels. This format excels when you have numerous pre-qualified suppliers and want to systematically narrow the field while discovering true market pricing.
Consider this approach for large-scale construction projects, multi-year service contracts, or situations where you need to balance price with supplier financial stability and long-term viability.
5. Sealed Bid Auctions
Sealed bid auctions are a particular case of an e-RFQ where you can't see what suppliers have submitted until after closing the event. This format requires suppliers to submit their best and final offers simultaneously without knowledge of competitors' pricing.
You can think of a sealed bid as a particular case of a British reverse auction with only one round of submissions, addressing the same fundamental issues: ensuring fair competition for suppliers while ensuring buyers get the best conditions suppliers can offer.
Advantages of Sealed Bid Auctions
Sealed bid auctions offer several practical advantages that make them popular for many procurement scenarios:
Eliminates gaming strategies since suppliers can't adjust bids based on competitor actions, often leading to more authentic pricing based on actual costs and desired margins.
Simple to implement and understand makes this format accessible to organizations with limited auction experience, as both buyers and suppliers are typically familiar with the concept.
Reduces time investment for both buyers and suppliers since the process concludes with a single bid submission, appealing to organizations managing multiple concurrent procurements.
Minimizes supplier collusion risk because participants can't coordinate bidding strategies during the auction process.
Disadvantages of Sealed Bid Auctions
The static nature of sealed bid auctions creates limitations that procurement professionals should consider:
Suppliers can't adapt their offer to their competition, which can result in either overly conservative or unsustainable aggressive pricing.
May not achieve maximum savings since suppliers often build safety margins into pricing to account for competitive uncertainty, resulting in more conservative bidding.
No opportunity for price improvement after submission means you're locked into whatever pricing suppliers initially provide.
Limited market feedback provides less intelligence about supplier capabilities and market conditions compared to dynamic auction formats.
When to use Sealed Bid Auctions?
Sealed bid auctions work best for straightforward procurement scenarios where requirements are clearly defined and you have confidence in your supplier pool. This format excels when time constraints prevent dynamic auctions or when supplier preferences strongly favor single-bid processes.
Consider this approach for routine purchases, when procurement regulations require sealed bidding, or when you're dealing with suppliers who are reluctant to participate in dynamic auction formats.
6. Weighted/Multi-Attribute Auctions
Weighted multi-attribute auctions evaluate bids based on multiple criteria beyond price, including quality, delivery time, and technical capabilities. Non-price factors are rolled up into a total "merit" score with each criterion receiving a predetermined weight reflecting its relative importance.
The main difference between weighted and multi-attribute auctions: with weighted auctions, suppliers can only modify prices. In multi-attribute auctions, suppliers can also modify other factors, such as delivery time or payment terms.
Suppliers can change prices whenever they want, and their rank will be determined based on the weight of the price combined with other factors set up by the buyer. Here's where procurement gets interesting. Price isn't everything.
Advantages of Weighted/Multi-Attribute Auctions
Multi-attribute auctions offer sophisticated capabilities that align with modern procurement best practices:
Optimizes total value rather than just minimizing cost, leading to better long-term procurement outcomes and helping avoid quality and service issues that can result from pure price competition.
Encourages innovation from suppliers who can differentiate themselves through superior technical solutions, delivery capabilities, or service offerings rather than competing solely on price.
Reflects real procurement priorities by allowing organizations to weigh factors like quality, sustainability, delivery performance, and technical capabilities according to their actual importance.
Allows dynamic adjustment where suppliers can modify various factors throughout the auction process, creating a more responsive, competitive environment.
Disadvantages of Weighted/Multi-Attribute Auctions
The sophisticated nature of multi-attribute auctions creates implementation complexities and administrative challenges that organizations must carefully manage:
Complex to design and implement requires sophisticated scoring methodologies and a clear definition of evaluation criteria. Poor design can lead to unintended outcomes or supplier complaints about fairness.
Difficult for suppliers to optimize their proposals when multiple variables are involved, potentially discouraging participation or leading to suboptimal submissions.
Subjective scoring elements may introduce bias or create disputes about evaluation fairness. Maintaining objectivity across multiple criteria requires careful process design.
Higher administrative burden involves more complex evaluation procedures and potentially longer decision timelines compared to price-only auctions.
When to use Weighted/Multi-Attribute Auctions?
Weighted/multi-attribute auctions excel when price is important but not the sole selection criterion. This format works best for complex procurements where quality, innovation, delivery performance, or other factors significantly impact the value equation.
Consider this approach for strategic supplier selections, technology procurements where innovation matters, service contracts where quality is crucial, or any situation where the cheapest option might not deliver the best overall value.
How To Choose The Right Auction Format
Selecting the appropriate auction format requires careful consideration of your specific procurement context, supplier market characteristics, and organizational objectives. But here's what most procurement guides won't tell you: there's no perfect formula. Here's how you can decide on the right format for your organization:
Check your spend analytics: Where can you reduce costs? This baseline analysis helps you understand where auctions can deliver the most impact.
Determine the number of bidders that will join your event. Participation level significantly influences which format will work best.
Factor in market competition: Is competition between suppliers' pricing strong? Some formats work better in highly competitive markets, while others excel when competition is limited.
Evaluate the expected bidding approach: Are your potential suppliers aggressive in their bidding, or do they tend to be more conservative?
Consider the consistency of specifications and qualifications: Do some of your qualified bidders have unique capabilities that differentiate them from others?
Based on your answers, you can choose the right e-auction format for your organization by taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of each type of auction:
Top-performing companies usually use a multiphase strategy by using multiple auction types successively. For example, you can use a British reverse auction followed by a Dutch reverse auction to ensure you get the best offer.
The best outcomes for any sourcing projects are usually obtained through thorough preparation, well before the event starts. Understanding market dynamics and what will determine suppliers to place their best offers is key to success.
How can Prokuria's software help reverse auction processes in your company?
Implementing successful reverse auctions requires more than just understanding different formats. You need robust technology platforms, experienced process management, and sophisticated supplier relationship capabilities to maximize benefits while avoiding common pitfalls.
Prokuria's reverse auction software streamlines the entire procurement process from supplier invitation through contract award. Our platform supports all major auction formats, providing flexibility to choose the right approach for each procurement scenario. Advanced analytics help you optimize format selection based on historical performance and market characteristics.
The software maximizes savings through intelligent auction design and real-time market insights. Automated supplier qualification, dynamic bidding extensions, and comprehensive reporting ensure you achieve optimal outcomes while maintaining supplier relationships and market integrity.
Ready to transform your procurement processes? Contact Prokuria today to learn how our reverse auction software can help your organization achieve significant cost savings while streamlining supplier selection and enhancing procurement efficiency.
Are you ready to become a top-performing company? Book your FREE demo with Prokuria today!